Maximized windows don’t really make much sense on widescreen or ultrawide displays anyway, especially for a text-heavy site like this. For me, at least, the whole point of a wider screen is so that you can fit multiple windows side-by-side on it.
As someone who has designed for web, I can say that having the site look “skinny” is actually a good thing.
Yes, sites are responsive, but only to a certain point. When the screen gets to wide, you want to stop scaling everything up. You don’t want text to be too large and you don’t want all the photos and elements to be too wide.
The most important thing is you don’t want each line of text to be too long. For text to be readable, you only want 9-12 words per line, anything longer makes it more difficult for humans to read.
This is why on well-designed websites, there will be a max width in place and the website will look skinny on ultrawide monitors.
to echo what everyone else says yes it looks like this and it is good this way and intentional. as a designer a legible line length makes a big difference in user experience. i think keebtalk is laid out great as is
It’s skinny down the middle like that on my 3440x1440, but I’m fine with that. My monitor is wide so I can comfortably have four vertical splits in vim, or fit two browser windows side by side - not so I can read wide rows of text.